Comments on: Windows 7 Build 7000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/ The latest technology news Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:34:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: holdyourhorses http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-2/#comment-343 holdyourhorses Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:03:04 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-343 I never had any problems nor bugs encountered using the Windows 7 beta version. To think that I am running it using a super slow VIA C 7 processor. The performance of Windows 7 is way a lot better than Vista using the same processor. I don't know what you RAge227 is talking about. I never had any problems nor bugs encountered using the Windows 7 beta version. To think that I am running it using a super slow VIA C 7 processor. The performance of Windows 7 is way a lot better than Vista using the same processor. I don’t know what you RAge227 is talking about.

]]> By: RAge227 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-340 RAge227 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:26:08 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-340 Maybe some of you code writing morons should learn a little something about quality control! Get all of the bugs out before before releasing it to the public! For all of your claimed brilliance, something so simple should come so easy. Maybe some of you code writing morons should learn a little something about quality control! Get all of the bugs out before before releasing it to the public! For all of your claimed brilliance, something so simple should come so easy.

]]> By: Carnifage http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-321 Carnifage Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:21:40 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-321 I love how idiots like Carniphage throw their 2 cents in without actually knowing what they're talking about. You morons need to be aware that by going back and reworking the guts of the kernel and other basic functionality that they'll likely destroy the cornerstone on which Windows was made popular: THE BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY. Yeah, you can be a total fuckwit and jab about how Vista wasn't backwards compatible, but then you'd only be proving what a moron you are because it really wasn't as bad as people made it out to be: All my stuff worked with vista pre-SP1 and many others I know have had no problems with backwards compatibility, no more so than they've had when transitioning between windows 98 to Windows 2000 or even 2000 to XP. In fact, for me, the transition between XP and Vista was by far the least painful out of all the version switches. Read Raymond Chen's blog for some real eye opening stuff on just how much work goes into making sure your pathetic software is working with the latest and greatest. Learn to appreciate the work we programmers put into our products. When idiots like Carniphage (who've likely never seen, let alone written, a line of code in their lives) vomit forth stupidity like "There’s some bad engineering which desperately needs fixing" as if THEY can do better, it makes me sick. Please all of you brilliant armchair developers: Make an Operating System that'll be problem free, have 0 design compromises, have the ultimate in backwards compatibility and be 100% stable and secure no matter what. Until then, just shut it. You're not qualified to give your opinion. @IamMyOwnAlterEgo Idiot. They've been ripping off Windows for years, it's about time they contributed something back. After all, aren't you linux twerps all about sharing? I love how idiots like Carniphage throw their 2 cents in without actually knowing what they’re talking about. You morons need to be aware that by going back and reworking the guts of the kernel and other basic functionality that they’ll likely destroy the cornerstone on which Windows was made popular: THE BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY. Yeah, you can be a total fuckwit and jab about how Vista wasn’t backwards compatible, but then you’d only be proving what a moron you are because it really wasn’t as bad as people made it out to be: All my stuff worked with vista pre-SP1 and many others I know have had no problems with backwards compatibility, no more so than they’ve had when transitioning between windows 98 to Windows 2000 or even 2000 to XP. In fact, for me, the transition between XP and Vista was by far the least painful out of all the version switches.

Read Raymond Chen’s blog for some real eye opening stuff on just how much work goes into making sure your pathetic software is working with the latest and greatest. Learn to appreciate the work we programmers put into our products. When idiots like Carniphage (who’ve likely never seen, let alone written, a line of code in their lives) vomit forth stupidity like “There’s some bad engineering which desperately needs fixing” as if THEY can do better, it makes me sick.

Please all of you brilliant armchair developers: Make an Operating System that’ll be problem free, have 0 design compromises, have the ultimate in backwards compatibility and be 100% stable and secure no matter what. Until then, just shut it. You’re not qualified to give your opinion.

@IamMyOwnAlterEgo
Idiot. They’ve been ripping off Windows for years, it’s about time they contributed something back. After all, aren’t you linux twerps all about sharing?

]]> By: oni http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-314 oni Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:22:29 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-314 @Otto: With regards to the printer drivers, Microsoft hasn't changed much/any of the driver side of the OS, so all Vista drivers will work on Windows 7. @Otto: With regards to the printer drivers, Microsoft hasn’t changed much/any of the driver side of the OS, so all Vista drivers will work on Windows 7.

]]> By: Marcel http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-313 Marcel Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:15:34 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-313 lol u man give me jokes im using windows 7 as i type its faster than vista any day this is the first Os from MS where i haven't even had to install a single driver for any hardware its great System Spec Intel core 2 2.33GHz 2Gb Ram On Board Graphics and i can still run it with full pretty looks Dual booting with Vista 64 Bit Ultimate. lol u man give me jokes im using windows 7 as i type its faster than vista any day this is the first Os from MS where i haven’t even had to install a single driver for any hardware its great

System Spec

Intel core 2 2.33GHz
2Gb Ram
On Board Graphics and i can still run it with full pretty looks

Dual booting with Vista 64 Bit Ultimate.

]]> By: Otto http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-310 Otto Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:21:48 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-310 OH Also! Do I have to buy a new Printer and Scanner. Will HP be able to make them work with Windows 7. They never were able to fix the Vista version. Please bring back the Melinium ME. Please... OH Also! Do I have to buy a new Printer and Scanner. Will HP be able to make them work with Windows 7. They never were able to fix the Vista version. Please bring back the Melinium ME. Please…

]]> By: Otto http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-309 Otto Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:14:29 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-309 Bring back the Mellinium ME. That was the best OS. I have bought 6 Vista OSs, not one really worked as good as my Mellinium. I do mostly Digital Photos and Videos. which worked great with the Melinium without having to import Quick Time from Apple. For some strange reason Microsoft does not use the .MOV application. Bring back the Mellinium ME. That was the best OS. I have bought 6 Vista OSs, not one really worked as good as my Mellinium. I do mostly Digital Photos and Videos. which worked great with the Melinium without having to import Quick Time from Apple. For some strange reason Microsoft does not use the .MOV application.

]]> By: grizzlymathers http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-305 grizzlymathers Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:11:47 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-305 vista also has me thinking...(mac) vista also has me thinking…(mac)

]]> By: SilverKnight http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-301 SilverKnight Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:43:01 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-301 My comments are along the same line as Larry's comments he left on 1-8-09. Vista was very expensive and then you have add the ultimate upgrade which was like another couple hundred dolllars. I guess my question is when will MS cut us all a break? How much more do we have to pay for their fix? And his comment about going to Mac OS made me even think of that option too. My comments are along the same line as Larry’s comments he left on 1-8-09. Vista was very expensive and then you have add the ultimate upgrade which was like another couple hundred dolllars. I guess my question is when will MS cut us all a break?
How much more do we have to pay for their fix? And his comment about going to Mac OS made me even think of that option too.

]]> By: Rabbit http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/comment-page-1/#comment-290 Rabbit Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:46:41 +0000 http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/?p=237#comment-290 looks like Vista to me :( looks like Vista to me :(

]]>